바나흐-알라오글루 정리

Banach–Alaoglu theorem

수학기능분석과 관련 분기에서 바나흐-알라오글루 정리(알라오글루의 정리라고도 함)는 규범 벡터 공간이중공간닫힌 단위볼 약* 위상에서는 콤팩트하다고 기술하고 있다.[1]일반적인 증거는 제품 토폴로지와 콤팩트 세트 제품의 닫힌 부분 집합으로서 약한* 토폴로지를 가진 유닛 볼을 식별한다.타이코노프의 정리 결과, 이 제품, 그리고 따라서 내부의 유닛볼은 콤팩트하다.

이 정리는 관측 가능성의 대수적 상태 집합, 즉 어떤 상태도 소위 순수 상태의 볼록한 선형 결합으로 쓸 수 있다는 것을 설명할 때 물리학에서 응용이 있다.

역사

로렌스 나리치와 에드워드 베켄슈타인에 따르면, 알라오글루 정리는 "매우 중요한 결과 - 아마도 약한* 위상에 대한 가장 중요한 사실 - 기능 분석 전반에 걸쳐 에초"이다.[2]1912년, 는 C(, b 의 연속적인 이중 의 단위 공([a, 약하다는 것을 증명했다[3]1932년에 Stefan Banach는 분리 가능규범 공간의 연속적인 이중 공간에서의 닫힌 유닛 볼이 순차적으로 약하다는 것을 증명했다-* 콤팩트(Banach는 순차적 컴팩트만 고려했다).[3]일반 사건의 증거는 수학자 레오니다스 알라오글루에 의해 1940년에 발표되었다.Pietsch [2007년]에 따르면, 이 정리를 주장할 수 있는 수학자는 적어도 12명 또는 그 정리의 중요한 전임자가 있다고 한다.[2]

부르바키족알라오글루 정리부르바키국부적으로 볼록한 공간이중 토폴로지를 적용하기 위해 원래 정리를[4][5] 일반화한 것이다.이 정리는 바나흐 알라오글루 정리 또는 약* 콤팩트 정리라고도 하며 흔히 간단히 알라오글루 정리라고[2] 부른다.

성명서

If is a vector space over the field then will denote the algebraic dual space of and these two spaces are henceforth associated with the bilinear evaluation map rangele : {K에 의해 정의됨

여기서 트리플 , # X은 표준 듀얼 시스템이라고 불리는 이중 시스템을 형성한다.

이(가) 위상학적 벡터 공간(TV)인 경우 연속적인 이중 공간, X 로 표시되며, X′ X# X 항상 유지된다.Denote the weak-* topology on by and denote the weak-* topology on by The weak-* topology is also called the topology of pointwise convergence because given a map and a net of maps the net converges to in this to만일 도메인의 모든 지점 x 에 대해 값의 순( ( ) I 으로 수렴되는 에만 pology

알라오글루 정리[3]연속적인 이중 X , X(를) 갖는 모든 위상학적 벡터 X{\}(필수적으로 하우스도르프 또는 로컬 볼록스일 필요는 없음).

기원의 X에서 어떤 동네 가U{U\displaystyle}중에서 X′.{\displaystyle X^{\prime}에weak-* topology[노트 1]σ(X′, X){\displaystyle \sigma \left(X^{\prime},X\right)}에{X\displaystyle}은 계약이다.}게다가, U({\displaystyle U^{\circ}}U{\dis의 북극곰과 같습니다.playst with respect to the canonical system and it is also a compact subset of

이중성 이론과 관련된 증거

증명

기본 필드K {\ { 실제 R{\ { 또는 복잡한 C{\ 이 증명은 문서에 나열된 기본 속성 중 일부를 사용한다. 극성 세트, 이중 시스템m연속 선형 연산자.

증명을 시작하기 위해 일부 정의와 쉽게 검증된 결과를 회수한다.When is endowed with the weak-* topology then this Hausdorff locally convex topological vector space is denoted by The space is always a complete TVS; however, may fail to be a complete space, which is the reason why this proof는 공간#, X)을 포함한다 {\X^{\#},\X^{\#},right)\ 구체적으로 이 증거는 완전한 하우스도르프 공간의 부분집합이 닫히고 완전히 경계된 경우에만 압축된다는 사실을 사용할 것이다.Importantly, the subspace topology that inherits from is equal to 이는 f , X 에 있는 net이 다른 위상의 X}에 수렴되는 경우에만 위상 중 하나에서 에 수렴된다는 것을 쉽게 확인할 수 있다(결론).두 가지 토폴로지는 정확히 동일한 수렴 그물을 가지고 있는 경우에만 동일하다.

트리플 , X { {\ X는) 으로 이중 시스템임을 보장하지는 않지만 이중 페어링이다전체적으로, 달리 명시되지 않는 한, 모든 극세트는 표준 쌍인 X X에 대해 취해진다.

을(를) 의 원점 부근으로 설정하고 다음을 수행하십시오.

  • be the polar of with respect to the canonical pairing ;
  • be the bipolar of with respect to ;
  • be the polar of with respect to the canonical dual system Note that

극지방 집합에 대해 잘 알려진 사실은 u U \circle \ U이다.

  1. Show that is a -closed subset of Let and suppose that 는) # U 수렴되는 로서 ( )의{\ To conclude that it is sufficient (and necessary) to show that for every Because in the scalar field and every value belongs to the closed (in ) subset so too must this net's limit belong to this set.따라서 ( ) 1.
  2. #= U 표시 and then conclude that is a closed subset of both and 포함된 # U 모든 연속 선형 기능은 (특히) 선형 기능이기 때문에 유지된다.For the reverse inclusion let so that which states exactly that the linear functional is bounded on t그는 이웃 U 따라서 은(, f X X 연속적인 선형 기능이며, f U ,{\ f UUsing (1) and the fact that the intersection is closed in the subspace topology on the claim about being closed follows.
  3. Show that is a -totally bounded subset of By the bipolar theorem, where because the neighborhood is an absorbing subset of the same must be true of the set it is possible to prove that this implies that is a -bounded subset of Because distinguishes points of a subset of is -bounded if and only if it is -totally 경계.그래서 특히 U( , ){\ 완전 경계로 되어 있다.
  4. Conclude that is also a -totally bounded subset of Recall that the topology on 이(가) 하는 서브스페이스 토폴로지 ( ) .rig)\rig)\rig)\right와 동일하다. 이 사실은 (3)과 "완전 경계"의 정의와 함께 U -완전 경계된 #. X 하위 집합임을 암시한다.
  5. Finally, deduce that is a -compact subset of Because is a complete TVS and is a closed (by (2)) and totally bounded (by (4)) subset of it follows that is compact.

(가) 표준 벡터 공간이라면, 이웃의 극은 닫히고 이중 공간에서 표준 경계로 한다.특히 (가) 의 열린(또는 닫힌) 단위공인 경우 의 극성은 X}의 연속 X Xprim 에 있는 닫힌 단위공이다.따라서 이 정리는 다음과 같이 전문화될 수 있다.

Banach-Alaoglu 정리 (가) 정규 공간인 경우 연속 이중 공간 X평소 운영자 규범이 부여됨)의 닫힌 단위 공은 약한-* 위상에 대해 콤팩트하다.

연속 이중 X X이 무한 치수 규범 공간인 경우, 의 닫힌 단위 공이 일반적인 표준 위상일 때 콤팩트 서브셋이 되는 것은 불가능하다.이는 공간이 유한 차원(cf)인 경우에만 표준 위상에서의 단위 볼이 소형이기 때문이다.F. 리에즈 정리).이 정리는 동일한 벡터 공간에서 서로 다른 위상들을 갖는 효용성의 한 예다.

외관에도 불구하고 바나흐-알라오글루 정리는 약한-* 위상이 국소적으로 콤팩트하다는 것을 의미하지 않는다는 점에 유의해야 한다.이는 닫힌 단위 공이 강한 위상에서는 원점 부근에 불과하지만, 공간이 유한한 경우가 아니라면 약한* 위상에서는 빈 내부가 있기 때문에 보통 약한* 위상에서는 원점 부근이 아니기 때문이다.사실 모든 국소적 소형하우스도르프 위상 벡터 공간은 유한한 차원이어야 한다는 것이 웨일의 결과다.

기초 교정쇄

다음의 증거는 집합 이론, 위상 및 기능 분석의 기본적인 개념만을 포함한다.특히 위상으로부터 필요한 것은 위상학적 공간에서의 에 대한 실무지식이며, 선형기능이 원점 부근에 경계되어 있는 경우에만 선형기능이 지속된다는 사실에 익숙하다(자세한 내용은 연속 선형함수하위선형함수에 관한 기사 참조).Also required is a proper understanding of the technical details of how the space of all functions of the form is identified as the Cartesian product and the relationship between대수적 X # X 같은 부분집합과 x r . }}}}}이(가) 관심 있는 독자를 위해 이러한 세부사항에 대한 설명이 제공된다.

제품/기능 공간, 그물 및 포인트와이즈 융합 시 초연

The Cartesian product is usually thought of as the set of all -indexed tuples but, since tuples are technically just functions from an indexing set, it can also는 현재 설명한 대로 ,{\ X\mathb 시제품이 있는 모든 함수 X{\ X\to \ 공간과 동일해야 한다.

  • Function Tuple: A function belonging to is identified with its (-indexed) "tuple of values"
  • 투플 함수:A tuple in is identified with the function defined by s_ 이 함수의 "값의 튜플"은 원래 튜플 x) . X

이것이 많은 저자들이 평등을 종종 논평 없이 쓰는 이유다.

그리고 왜 까르테시안 {X K {\ \in X}\ {K이(가) 지도 집합의 정의로 받아들여지는가 하면, 그 이유는 때때로 로 K ^{X또는 반대로)이다.그러나, 데카르트 제품은 (역행 한도의 일종인) 세트 범주의 (범주형) 제품으로서, 그것의 (좌표형) 투영이라고 알려진 관련 맵도 함께 제공된다.

주어진 지점 에서 데카르트 제품표준 투영법이 함수임

여기서 z 은(는) s: s를) \mathb {K}에 전송한다.
말로 표현하면, z{\z} 및 s에 대해{\ s " 을( {\displaystyle 플러그하는 은 "z {\ 같다.

In particular, suppose that are non-negative real numbers and that for every real Then where under the above identification of tuples with functions, is the set of all functions s( x) B x X

부분 집합 X X 파티션 (를) = ) {\ X= (setminus U으로 분할하면 선형 바이어싱

이 두 가지 카르테시안 제품을 표준적으로 식별한다. 더욱이 이 지도는 이 제품들이 그들의 제품 토폴로지를 부여 받았을 때의 동형상이다.기능 공간의 측면에서, 이러한 편향은 다음과 같이 표현될 수 있다.

과 표기법

=( i) I 정의상 함수 : → X → X → 비어 있지 않은 지시 집합, )에서 에로의 I X. 의 모든 시퀀스 → X, {\displaystyle \도 그물이다.시퀀스와 마찬가지로 색인 에서netx ∙{\displaystyle i I의 값은 로 표시되지만 이 경우 이 은 일반적인 괄호 x ()로도 표시될 수 있다. Similarly for function composition, if is any function then the net (or sequence) that results from "plugging into " is just the function although this is typically denoted by (or by if is a sequence).아래의 교정에서, 이 결과로 생긴 그물은 다음 중 어느 하나에 의해 증명될 수 있다.

어떤 표기법이 가장 깨끗한지 또는 가장 명확하게 의도된 정보를 전달하는지에 따라.In particular, if is continuous and in then the conclusion commonly written as may instead be written ) ) 또는 Fx) → F). to F로.

세트 = x X은(는) 제품 토폴로지와 함께 부여된 것으로 가정한다.제품 토폴로지가 포인트와이즈 융합 토폴로지와 동일하다는 것은 잘 알려져 있다.This is because given and a net where and every is an element of then the net ) I → f {\in I}\ f은(는) 제품 토폴로지에서 다음 같은 경우에만 수렴됨

for every the net converges in

여기서 ( )= ( z)

따라서( ) I은(는) . 에서 방향으로 f 에 수렴하는 경우에만 제품 토폴로지에서 }에 수렴한다.

증거는 위상학적 하위공간으로 통과할 때 점적합성의 위상이 보존된다는 사실이 될 것이다.This means, for example, that if for every is some (topological) subspace of then the topology of pointwise convergence (or equivalently, the product topology) on is equal to the subspace topology that the set inherits from And if is closed in for every 다음에 x X은(는)x x x . X의 닫힌 하위 집합이다

u r r

Suppose that is a non-empty subset and for every real let and let {: c r은(는) 0 중심을 둔 반경 의 닫힌 공이어야 한다는 중요한 사실이 되는 것이다

where denotes the supremum and As a side note, this characterization does not hold if the closed ball is replaced with thE오픈 공{c∈ K:c<>r}{\displaystyle\와 같이{c\in \mathbb{K}:c<>r\}}(그리고 교체sup 너 ∈ Uf(u)≤ r{\displaystyle\;\sup_{u\in U}f(u)\leq r\.}과 엄격한 불평등 너 저녁밥을 먹다 ∈ Uf(u)<>r{\displaystyle\;\sup_{u\in U}f(u)<>r\.}이 변하지 않을 것이다;. counter-examples, consider and the identity map on ).

The essence of the Banach–Alaoglu theorem can be found in the next proposition, from which the Banach–Alaoglu theorem follows. Unlike the Banach–Alaoglu theorem, this proposition does not require the vector space to endowed with any topology.

Proposition[3]Let be a subset of a vector space over the field (where ) and for every real number endow the closed ball with its usual topology ( need not be endowed with any topology, but has its usual Euclidean topology). Define

If for every is a real number such that then is a closed and compact subspace of the product space (where because this product topology is identical to the topology of pointwise convergence, which is also called the weak-* topology in functional analysis, this means that is compact in the weak-* topology or "weak-* compact" for short).

Before proving the proposition above, it is first shown how the Banach–Alaoglu theorem follows from it (unlike the proposition, Banach–Alaoglu assumes that is a topological vector space (TVS) and that is a neighborhood of the origin).

Proof that Banach–Alaoglu follows from the proposition above

Assume that is a topological vector space with continuous dual space and that is a neighborhood of the origin. Because is a neighborhood of the origin in it is also an absorbing subset of so for every there exists a real number such that Thus the hypotheses of the above proposition are satisfied, and so the set is therefore compact in the weak-* topology. The proof of the Banach–Alaoglu theorem will be complete once it is shown that [note 2] where recall that was defined as

Proof that Because the conclusion is equivalent to If then which states exactly that the linear functional is bounded on the neighborhood thus is a continuous linear functional (that is, ), as desired.

Proof of Proposition

The product space is compact by Tychonoff's theorem (since each closed ball is a Hausdorff[note 3] compact space). Because a closed subset of a compact space is compact, the proof of the proposition will be complete once it is shown that

is a closed subset of The following statements guarantee this conclusion:

  1. is a closed subset of the product space

Proof of (1):

For any let denote the projection to the th coordinate (as defined above). To prove that it is sufficient (and necessary) to show that for every So fix and let Because it remains to show that Recall that was defined in the proposition's statement as being any positive real number that satisfies (so for example, would be a valid choice for each ), which implies Because is a positive homogeneous function that satisfies

Thus which shows that as desired.

Proof of (2):

The algebraic dual space is always a closed subset of (this is proved in the lemma below for readers who are not familiar with this result). The set

is closed in the product topology on since it is a product of closed subsets of (an alternative proof that utilizes nets to show that is closed is also given below). Thus is an intersection of two closed subsets of which proves (2).[note 4]

This conclusion that is closed can also be reached by applying the following more general result to the special case and

Observation: If is any set and if is a closed subset of a topological space then is a closed subset of in the topology of pointwise convergence.
Proof of observation: Let and suppose that is a net in that converges pointwise to It remains to show that which by definition means For any because in and every value belongs to the closed (in ) subset so too must this net's limit belong to this closed set; thus which completes the proof.

Lemma ( is closed in )The algebraic dual space of any vector space over a field (where is or ) is a closed subset of in the topology of pointwise convergence. (The vector space need not be endowed with any topology).

Proof of lemma

Let and suppose that is a net in the converges to in For any let denote 's net of values at

To conclude that it must be shown that is a linear functional so let be a scalar and let Because in which has the topology of pointwise convergence, in for every By using in place of it follows that each of the following nets of scalars converges in


Proof that Let be the "multiplication by " map defined by Because is continuous and in it follows that where the right hand side is and the left hand side is

which proves that Because also and limits in are unique, it follows that as desired.


Proof that Define a net by letting for every Because and it follows that in Let be the addition map defined by The continuity of implies that in where the right hand side is and the left hand side is

which proves that Because also it follows that as desired.

The lemma above actually also follows from its corollary below since is a Hausdorff complete uniform space and any subset of such a space (in particular ) is closed if and only if it is complete.

Corollary to lemma ( is weak-* complete)When the algebraic dual space of a vector space is equipped with the topology of pointwise convergence (also known as the weak-* topology) then the resulting topological space is a complete Hausdorff locally convex topological vector space.

Proof of corollary to lemma

Because the underlying field is a complete Hausdorff locally convex topological vector space, the same is true of the product space A closed subset of a complete space is complete, so by the lemma, the space is complete.


The above elementary proof of the Banach–Alaoglu theorem actually shows that if is any subset that satisfies (such as any absorbing subset of ), then is a weak-* compact subset of

As a side note, with the help of the above elementary proof, it may be shown (see this footnote)[proof 1] that there exist -indexed non-negative real numbers such that

where these real numbers can also be chosen to be "minimal" in the following sense: using (so as in the proof) and defining the notation for any if
then and for every which shows that these numbers are unique; indeed, this infimum formula can be used to define them.

In fact, if denotes the set of all such products of closed balls containing the polar set

then where denotes the intersection of all sets belonging to

This implies (among other things[note 5]) that the unique least element of with respect to this may be used as an alternative definition of this (necessarily convex and balanced) set. The function is a seminorm and it is unchanged if is replaced by the convex balanced hull of (because ). Similarly, because is also unchanged if is replaced by its closure in

Sequential Banach–Alaoglu theorem

A special case of the Banach–Alaoglu theorem is the sequential version of the theorem, which asserts that the closed unit ball of the dual space of a separable normed vector space is sequentially compact in the weak-* topology. In fact, the weak* topology on the closed unit ball of the dual of a separable space is metrizable, and thus compactness and sequential compactness are equivalent.

Specifically, let be a separable normed space and the closed unit ball in Since is separable, let be a countable dense subset. Then the following defines a metric, where for any

in which denotes the duality pairing of with Sequential compactness of in this metric can be shown by a diagonalization argument similar to the one employed in the proof of the Arzelà–Ascoli theorem.

Due to the constructive nature of its proof (as opposed to the general case, which is based on the axiom of choice), the sequential Banach–Alaoglu theorem is often used in the field of partial differential equations to construct solutions to PDE or variational problems. For instance, if one wants to minimize a functional on the dual of a separable normed vector space one common strategy is to first construct a minimizing sequence which approaches the infimum of use the sequential Banach–Alaoglu theorem to extract a subsequence that converges in the weak* topology to a limit and then establish that is a minimizer of The last step often requires to obey a (sequential) lower semi-continuity property in the weak* topology.

When is the space of finite Radon measures on the real line (so that is the space of continuous functions vanishing at infinity, by the Riesz representation theorem), the sequential Banach–Alaoglu theorem is equivalent to the Helly selection theorem.

Proof

For every let

and let
be endowed with the product topology. Because every is a compact subset of the complex plane, Tychonoff's theorem guarantees that their product is compact.

The closed unit ball in denoted by can be identified as a subset of in a natural way:

This map is injective and it is continuous when has the weak-* topology. This map's inverse, defined on its image, is also continuous.

It will now be shown that the image of the above map is closed, which will complete the proof of the theorem. Given a point and a net in the image of indexed by such that

the functional defined by
lies in and

Consequences

Consequences for normed spaces

Assume that is a normed space and endow its continuous dual space with the usual dual norm.

  • The closed unit ball in is weak-* compact.[3] So if is infinite dimensional then its closed unit ball is necessarily not compact in the norm topology by F. Riesz's theorem (despite it being weak-* compact).
  • A Banach space is reflexive if and only if its closed unit ball is -compact.[3]
  • If is a reflexive Banach space, then every bounded sequence in has a weakly convergent subsequence. (This follows by applying the Banach–Alaoglu theorem to a weakly metrizable subspace of ; or, more succinctly, by applying the Eberlein–Šmulian theorem.) For example, suppose that is the space Lp space where and let satisfy Let be a bounded sequence of functions in Then there exists a subsequence and an such that
    The corresponding result for is not true, as is not reflexive.

Consequences for Hilbert spaces

  • In a Hilbert space, every bounded and closed set is weakly relatively compact, hence every bounded net has a weakly convergent subnet (Hilbert spaces are reflexive).
  • As norm-closed, convex sets are weakly closed (Hahn–Banach theorem), norm-closures of convex bounded sets in Hilbert spaces or reflexive Banach spaces are weakly compact.
  • Closed and bounded sets in are precompact with respect to the weak operator topology (the weak operator topology is weaker than the ultraweak topology which is in turn the weak-* topology with respect to the predual of the trace class operators). Hence bounded sequences of operators have a weak accumulation point. As a consequence, has the Heine–Borel property, if equipped with either the weak operator or the ultraweak topology.

Relation to the axiom of choice and other statements

The Banach–Alaoglu may be proven by using Tychonoff's theorem, which under the Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory (ZF) axiomatic framework is equivalent to the axiom of choice. Most mainstream functional analysis relies on ZF + the axiom of choice, which is often denoted by ZFC. However, the theorem does not rely upon the axiom of choice in the separable case (see above): in this case there actually exists a constructive proof. In the general case of an arbitrary normed space, the ultrafilter Lemma, which is strictly weaker than the axiom of choice and equivalent to Tychonoff's theorem for compact Hausdorff spaces, suffices for the proof of the Banach–Alaoglu theorem, and is in fact equivalent to it.

The Banach–Alaoglu theorem is equivalent to the ultrafilter lemma, which implies the Hahn–Banach theorem for real vector spaces (HB) but is not equivalent to it (said differently, Banach–Alaoglu is also strictly stronger than HB). However, the Hahn–Banach theorem is equivalent to the following weak version of the Banach–Alaoglu theorem for normed space[6] in which the conclusion of compactness (in the weak-* topology of the closed unit ball of the dual space) is replaced with the conclusion of quasicompactness (also sometimes called convex compactness);

Weak version of Alaoglu theorem[6]Let be a normed space and let denote the closed unit ball of its continuous dual space Then has the following property, which is called quasicompactness or convex compactness: whenever is a cover of by convex weak-* closed subsets of such that has the finite intersection property, then is not empty.

Compactness implies convex compactness because a topological space is compact if and only if every family of closed subsets having the finite intersection property (FIP) has non-empty intersection. The definition of convex compactness is similar to this characterization of compact spaces in terms of the FIP, except that it only involves those closed subsets that are also convex (rather than all closed subsets).

See also

Notes

  1. ^ Explicitly, a subset is said to be "compact (resp. totally bounded, etc.) in the weak-* topology" if when is given the weak-* topology and the subset is given the subspace topology inherited from then is a compact (resp. totally bounded, etc.) space.
  2. ^ If denotes the topology that is (originally) endowed with, then the equality shows that the polar of is dependent only on (and ) and that the rest of the topology can be ignored. To clarify what is meant, suppose is any TVS topology on such that the set is (also) a neighborhood of the origin in Denote the continuous dual space of by and denote the polar of with respect to by
    so that is just the set from above. Then because both of these sets are equal to Said differently, the polar set 's defining "requirement" that be a subset of the continuous dual space is inconsequential and can be ignored because it does not have any effect on the resulting set of linear functionals. However, if is a TVS topology on such that is not a neighborhood of the origin in then the polar of with respect to is not guaranteed to equal and so the topology can not be ignored.
  3. ^ Because every is also a Hausdorff space, the conclusion that is compact only requires the so-called "Tychonoff's theorem for compact Hausdorff spaces," which is equivalent to the ultrafilter lemma and strictly weaker than the axiom of choice.
  4. ^ The conclusion can be written as The set may thus equivalently be defined by Rewriting the definition in this way helps make it apparent that the set is closed in because this is true of
  5. ^ This tuple is the least element of with respect to natural induced pointwise partial order defined by if and only if for every Thus, every neighborhood of the origin in can be associated with this unique (minimum) function For any if is such that then so that in particular, and for every

Proofs

  1. ^ For any non-empty subset the equality holds (the intersection on the left is a closed, rather than open, disk − possibly of radius − because it is an intersection of closed subsets of and so must itself be closed). For every let so that the previous set equality implies From it follows that and thereby making the least element of with respect to (In fact, the family is closed under (non-nullary) arbitrary intersections and also under finite unions of at least one set). The elementary proof showed that and are not empty and moreover, it also even showed that has an element that satisfies for every which implies that for every The inclusion is immediate; to prove the reverse inclusion, let By definition, if and only if so let and it remains to show that From it follows that which implies that as desired.

Citations

  1. ^ Rudin 1991, Theorem 3.15.
  2. ^ a b c Narici & Beckenstein 2011, pp. 235–240.
  3. ^ a b c d e f Narici & Beckenstein 2011, pp. 225–273.
  4. ^ Köthe 1983, Theorem (4) in §20.9.
  5. ^ Meise & Vogt 1997, Theorem 23.5.
  6. ^ a b Bell, J.; Fremlin, David (1972). "A Geometric Form of the Axiom of Choice" (PDF). Fundamenta Mathematicae. 77 (2): 167–170. Retrieved 26 Dec 2021.

References

Further reading